China’s Hybrid Response towards Emerging Security Alliances in the Indo-Pacific: A Defense Diplomacy Perspective
), Rodon Pedrason(2), Anak Agung Banyu Perwita(3), Surachman Surjaatmadja(4),
(1) Republic of Indonesia Defense University
(2) Republic of Indonesia Defense University
(3) Republic of Indonesia Defense University
(4) Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Corresponding Author
Abstract
The intensifying geopolitical rivalry in the Indo-Pacific has made China employ a hybrid strategy to respond to emerging security alliances in the Indo-Pacific, such as the QUAD, AUKUS, JAPHUS, and SQUAD, by combining militarization, economic coercion, and selective diplomatic engagement, to resist perceived containment while avoiding direct conflict. This qualitative research aims to assess the effectiveness of the strategies and analyze the impact of the responses on regional security stability, through the lens of defense diplomacy and hybrid warfare theoretical framework. Rooted in realist principles, China's response complicates the effectiveness of alliance-based security frameworks and undermines traditional defense diplomacy norms. While China's assertive actions heighten regional tensions, its simultaneous engagement in bilateral economic deals and crisis management mechanisms offers temporary de-escalation. China's strategic maneuvers are designed to solidify its long-term hegemony and test the resilience of regional security frameworks while diminishing US influence.
Keywords
References
Ahluwalia, V. K. (2020). Hybrid Warfare: A New Paradigm of War.
Amir, A., & Krishnan, A. (2021). The Indo-Pacific Strategy: A New Era of Geopolitical Rivalry. Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 45-67.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Erickson, A. S., & Kennedy, C. (2016). China's Island Building in the South China Sea: A New Model for Maritime Power Projection. Naval War College Review, 69(4), 1-25.
Fravel, M. T. (2023). China's Strategy in the South China Sea: A New Approach to Maritime Disputes. International Security, 47(2), 5-40.
Gao, H., & Jia, B. (2018). The South China Sea Arbitration: A Chinese Perspective. Asian Journal of International Law, 8(1), 1-25.
Heydarian, R. J. (2020). The Philippines and China: A New Era of Economic Engagement. Asian Survey, 60(3), 487-510.
Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars.
Kuik, C. (2016). The ASEAN Way: A New Approach to Regional Security. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 38(2), 215-240.
Leonova, O. (2022). The Impact of the Strategic Partnership AUKUS on the Geopolitical Situation in the Indo-Pacific Region. International Organisations Research Journal.
Madan, T. (2022). The Quad as a Security Actor. Asia Policy 17(4), 49-56.
Myers, R. (2024). The US and Its Allies: Strengthening Security Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Asian Security Studies, 10(1), 1-30.
Patalano, A. (2021). Gray Zone Tactics in the South China Sea: Implications for Regional Security. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 17(1), 1-15.
Storey, I. (2022). Malaysia's Response to China's Maritime Assertiveness: A Balancing Act. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2022(1), 1-20.
Thayer, C. A. (2021). ASEAN and the South China Sea: The Challenge of Collective Action. Asian Security, 17(2), 1-20.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 38 times
Download : 17 times
DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v4i2.5631
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Kristoforus Evan Andriyanto, Rodon Pedrason, Anak Agung Banyu Perwita, Surachman Surjaatmadja
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
