Analisis Soal UTS Fisika Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Batang Kuis Berbasis Comparative Thinking: Validitas, Reliabilitas, Kesukaran, dan Daya Pembeda

(1) Universitas Negeri Medan
(2) Universitas Negeri Medan
(3) Universitas Negeri Medan
(4) Universitas Negeri Medan
(5) Universitas Negeri Medan

Abstract
Penelitian ini menganalisis kualitas instrumen evaluasi fisika berbasis comparative thinking melalui parameter validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya pembeda. Metode deskriptif kuantitatif diterapkan pada 20 soal pilihan ganda yang diujikan kepada 36 siswa kelas XI IPA di SMA Negeri Kota Medan. Hasil menunjukkan 4 soal tidak valid (r-hitung <0,329) akibat ketiadaan konteks komparatif, sementara reliabilitas instrumen memenuhi kriteria (α=0,749). Distribusi tingkat kesukaran didominasi soal mudah (50%) dengan indeks >0,7, sedangkan 45% soal memiliki daya pembeda rendah (D<0,3), terutama pada pertanyaan prosedural tanpa analisis multidimensi. Temuan mengungkap ketimpangan antara tuntutan comparative thinking dan struktur soal yang cenderung terisolasi. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan integrasi skenario komparatif berbasis kasus, penyeimbangan parameter psikometrik, serta optimalisasi distraktor untuk meningkatkan validitas konstruk dan daya diagnostik instrumen. Implikasinya, pengembangan soal fisika perlu mengadopsi pendekatan komparatif sistematis guna mengukur kemampuan analitis siswa secara holistik.
Keywords
References
Anshari, H., & Kato, T. (2024). Comparative study of problem solving skill development features in Japanese and Indonesian high school physics textbooks. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika). https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v9i1.66651
Ardianto, D., Rubini, B., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2023).Assessing STEM career interest among secondary students: A Rasch model measurement analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12796
Chan, K. W., Ali, F., Park, J., Sham, K. S. B., Tan, E. Y. Chauhan, B. R., Vaza, J. V., Chauhan, G. R., & Chauhan, Dostal, J. (2024). Applying physics education research to teaching. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035307
Dzin, N. H. M., & Lay, Y. (2021). Assessing the validity and reliability of science multiple choice test using Rasch dichotomous measurement model. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.927
Elyani, E., Amir, H., Studi Pendidikan Kimia, P., Pmipa, J., Kunci, K., & Kreatif, B. (2019). PERBANDINGAN PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA KELAS X MIPA SMAN 6 KOTA BENGKULU. 3(1), 82–90.
Fayanto, S., Naba, S. D., Kurniawan, A., Putri, U., & Padang, V. D. (2024). The analyze comparative of physics computational thinking skill (CTs) in experiment laboratory. Qubahan Academic Journal, 1. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a699
Goran, M. B., Bili, M., Kaleka, U., Daud, M. H., Studi, P., Fisika, P., & Biologi, P. (n.d.). PROFIL KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF FISIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 1 DEMON PAGONG FLORES TIMUR.
Gusmizain, A. (2022). Karakteristik butir soal tes mata kuliah matriks & ruang vektor mahasiswa matematika. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v13i2.28328
Hasanah, S., & Hidayat, A. (n.d.). Identifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Materi Termodinamika. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/
Hikmah Marisda, D., & Handayani Hamid, Y. (2022). ASSESSMEN FLUENCY OF THINKING, FLEXIBILITY, DAN ELABORATION CALON GURU FISIKA: DESAIN, DAN VALIDITAS (Vol. 11, Issue 2). http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/TEK
Karan, K., Pal, S., & Guha, A. (2024). Development of science achievement test as a research tool for 9th grade students. Towards Excellence. https://doi.org/10.37867/te160103
Κurniawati, N. R., Hanipa, R., Azima, M., & Rokhmat, J. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Fisika Materi Elastisitas dan Hukum Hooke di SMAN 1 Labuapi. Contextual Natural Science Education Journal (CNSEJ), 2(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.29303/cnsej.v2i1.527
Liang, W.-J. (2001). Topic: Comparison in physic teaching. Journal of Shangrao Teachers College.
Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (n.d.). MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION in Education and Psychology.
Milda, D., Anggreiny, L. P., Simanjuntak, A., & Lubis, P. (2021). Correlation of difficulty index and discriminating index in medical student’s assessment. Paripex Indian Journal of Research. https://doi.org/10.36106/7900595
Pedaste, M., Baucal, A., & Reisenbuk, E. (2021). Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: Development of items and scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00278-z
Quantitative analysis towards higher order thinking skills of chemistry multiple choice questions for university admission. https://doi.org/10.24815/JIPI.V5I2.20508
R. H. (2024). Literature study of the application of the inquiry learning model towards 21st century skills in physics subjects in high school. EDUCTUM: Journal Research. https://doi.org/10.56495/ejr.v3i3.605
Reza, M., Puspita, K., & Oktaviani, C. (2021).
Riza, M., Kartono, K., & Susilaningsih, E. (2022). Validity and reliability of chemical test instruments for acid and base solutions oriented generic skills science. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v11i1.55450
Santyasa, I. W., Kanca, I., Warpala, I., Sudarma, I. K., Tegeh, I. M., & Sanjaya, L. (2019). Nature of science v.s direct instruction models in achieving seniorhigh school students’ critical thinking and their attitudes in learning physics. THE 8TH NATIONAL PHYSICS SEMINAR
T., Chong, F. W. C., ... & Sze, G. K. (2024). Automatic item generation in various STEM subjects using large language model prompting. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100344
Zhang, X.-Y. (2011). The application of comparative method in physics teaching. Journal of Science of Teachers' College and University.
Article Metrics
Abstract View

DOI: 10.57235/sakola.v2i1.5694
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Cinta Marcella Namira, Jessica Banjarnahor, Lourensia Bravini Lahera, Ribka Nainggolan, Septi Maria Gultom

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.