Peran Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dan Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sektor Jasa Keuangan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen

Manula Agapa(1),


(1) Universitas Pasundan
Corresponding Author

Abstract


The estabilishment of alternative dispute settlement institutions in the financial service sector by financial services authorithy as if it wants to compete with the existence of consumer dispute settlement agency. The estabilishment institutions of alternative dispute settlement in the financial service sector on the basic of financial service authority regulatory law number 1 year 2014 on the financial service authority, while consumer dispute settlement agency formed by the law number 8 year 1999. Verdict generated by these two institutions are final and binding, however against the verdict institutions of alternative dispute settlement in the financial service sector cannot be impelemnted if the consumer does not accept the verdict, giving rise to the possibility for financial service businesses to submit district court (of justice). Another case with verdict of the consumer dispute settlement agency it can be objected in district court (of justice) by one of the parties does not accept the verdict. The prosecuting authority (competence) of the institutions of alternative dispute resolution financial service sector and consumer dispute resolution has not been regulation, so that dualism in handling consumer disputes settlement agency. This is evidenced by the many disputes between the consumer banking or non-banking and non-financial services businesses were marked by consumer dispute settlement agency. Therefore need for strict regulation regarding the authority or competence of an absolute judge of these two institutions and needs for improvement of the legislation to get around this legal weaknes shortcomings.


Keywords


Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency, Institutions of Alternative Dispute Settlement in Financial Service Sector, Authority, Dispute

References


Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Ke-2. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010).

Anderson, R.A. dan W.A. Krumpt. Business Law. Ed.9. (Cincinnati: South- Western Publishing Co., 1972).

Arimbi. Lika Liku Perjalanan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. (Jakarta: YLKI, 2001).

Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus. “Perlindungan terhadap Konsumen Dilihat dari Sudut Perjanjian Baku (Standar) dalam BPHN”. Simposium Aspek-aspek Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. (Bandung: Binacipta, 1986).

D., Mukti Fajar N. dan Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Cetakan Ke-1.

Hardjasoemantri, Koesnadi. Hukum Tata Lingkungan. (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1994).

Irianto, Sulistyowati dan Shidarta. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Konstelasi dan Refleksi). (Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2009).

Kee, Ho Peng. “Consumer Protection in Singapore”. ASEAN Law Association. Record of the Proceedings of the General Assembly and Conference of the ASEAN Law Association. Vol.3. (Singapore: ALA, 1984).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005).

Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Ke-9. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014).


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 8 times
PDF Download : 9 times

DOI: 10.57235/jlc.v1i1.6096

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.57235/jlc.v1i1.6096.g4985

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Manula Agapa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.